Information on Result #551169
There is no linear OOA(294, 107, F2, 2, 47) (dual of [(107, 2), 120, 48]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(293, 107, F2, 46) (dual of [107, 14, 47]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(294, 108, F2, 47) (dual of [108, 14, 48]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(294, 107, F2, 3, 47) (dual of [(107, 3), 227, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(294, 107, F2, 4, 47) (dual of [(107, 4), 334, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(294, 107, F2, 5, 47) (dual of [(107, 5), 441, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(294, 107, F2, 6, 47) (dual of [(107, 6), 548, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(294, 107, F2, 7, 47) (dual of [(107, 7), 655, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(294, 107, F2, 8, 47) (dual of [(107, 8), 762, 48]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||