Information on Result #551184
There is no linear OOA(295, 99, F2, 2, 50) (dual of [(99, 2), 103, 51]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(293, 99, F2, 48) (dual of [99, 6, 49]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(295, 99, F2, 3, 50) (dual of [(99, 3), 202, 51]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(295, 99, F2, 4, 50) (dual of [(99, 4), 301, 51]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(295, 99, F2, 5, 50) (dual of [(99, 5), 400, 51]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(295, 99, F2, 6, 50) (dual of [(99, 6), 499, 51]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(295, 99, F2, 7, 50) (dual of [(99, 7), 598, 51]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(295, 99, F2, 8, 50) (dual of [(99, 8), 697, 51]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||