Information on Result #551214
There is no linear OOA(297, 99, F2, 2, 52) (dual of [(99, 2), 101, 53]-NRT-code), because 4 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(293, 99, F2, 48) (dual of [99, 6, 49]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(297, 99, F2, 3, 52) (dual of [(99, 3), 200, 53]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(297, 99, F2, 4, 52) (dual of [(99, 4), 299, 53]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(297, 99, F2, 5, 52) (dual of [(99, 5), 398, 53]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(297, 99, F2, 6, 52) (dual of [(99, 6), 497, 53]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(297, 99, F2, 7, 52) (dual of [(99, 7), 596, 53]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(297, 99, F2, 8, 52) (dual of [(99, 8), 695, 53]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||