Information on Result #551427
There is no linear OOA(2111, 114, F2, 2, 59) (dual of [(114, 2), 117, 60]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2108, 114, F2, 56) (dual of [114, 6, 57]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2111, 114, F2, 3, 59) (dual of [(114, 3), 231, 60]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2111, 114, F2, 4, 59) (dual of [(114, 4), 345, 60]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2111, 114, F2, 5, 59) (dual of [(114, 5), 459, 60]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2111, 114, F2, 6, 59) (dual of [(114, 6), 573, 60]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2111, 114, F2, 7, 59) (dual of [(114, 7), 687, 60]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2111, 114, F2, 8, 59) (dual of [(114, 8), 801, 60]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||