Information on Result #551475
There is no linear OOA(2114, 114, F2, 2, 62) (dual of [(114, 2), 114, 63]-NRT-code), because 6 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2108, 114, F2, 56) (dual of [114, 6, 57]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(2114, 114, F2, 3, 62) (dual of [(114, 3), 228, 63]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(2114, 114, F2, 4, 62) (dual of [(114, 4), 342, 63]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(2114, 114, F2, 5, 62) (dual of [(114, 5), 456, 63]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | No linear OOA(2114, 114, F2, 6, 62) (dual of [(114, 6), 570, 63]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | No linear OOA(2114, 114, F2, 7, 62) (dual of [(114, 7), 684, 63]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | No linear OOA(2114, 114, F2, 8, 62) (dual of [(114, 8), 798, 63]-NRT-code) | [i] |