Information on Result #551522
There is no linear OOA(2117, 114, F2, 2, 65) (dual of [(114, 2), 111, 66]-NRT-code), because 9 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2108, 114, F2, 56) (dual of [114, 6, 57]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2117, 114, F2, 3, 65) (dual of [(114, 3), 225, 66]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2117, 114, F2, 4, 65) (dual of [(114, 4), 339, 66]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2117, 114, F2, 5, 65) (dual of [(114, 5), 453, 66]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2117, 114, F2, 6, 65) (dual of [(114, 6), 567, 66]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2117, 114, F2, 7, 65) (dual of [(114, 7), 681, 66]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2117, 114, F2, 8, 65) (dual of [(114, 8), 795, 66]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||