Information on Result #551666
There is no linear OOA(2126, 120, F2, 2, 71) (dual of [(120, 2), 114, 72]-NRT-code), because 15 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2111, 120, F2, 56) (dual of [120, 9, 57]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(255, 63, F2, 28) (dual of [63, 8, 29]-code), but
- “BJV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2126, 120, F2, 3, 71) (dual of [(120, 3), 234, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2126, 120, F2, 4, 71) (dual of [(120, 4), 354, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2126, 120, F2, 5, 71) (dual of [(120, 5), 474, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2126, 120, F2, 6, 71) (dual of [(120, 6), 594, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||