Information on Result #551680
There is no linear OOA(2127, 128, F2, 2, 68) (dual of [(128, 2), 129, 69]-NRT-code), because 4 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2123, 128, F2, 64) (dual of [128, 5, 65]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2127, 128, F2, 3, 68) (dual of [(128, 3), 257, 69]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2127, 128, F2, 4, 68) (dual of [(128, 4), 385, 69]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2127, 128, F2, 5, 68) (dual of [(128, 5), 513, 69]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2127, 128, F2, 6, 68) (dual of [(128, 6), 641, 69]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2127, 128, F2, 7, 68) (dual of [(128, 7), 769, 69]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2127, 128, F2, 8, 68) (dual of [(128, 8), 897, 69]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||