Information on Result #551846

There is no linear OOA(2136, 158, F2, 2, 67) (dual of [(158, 2), 180, 68]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2135, 158, F2, 66) (dual of [158, 23, 67]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2136, 158, F2, 3, 67) (dual of [(158, 3), 338, 68]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(2136, 158, F2, 4, 67) (dual of [(158, 4), 496, 68]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2136, 158, F2, 5, 67) (dual of [(158, 5), 654, 68]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2136, 158, F2, 6, 67) (dual of [(158, 6), 812, 68]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2136, 158, F2, 7, 67) (dual of [(158, 7), 970, 68]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2136, 158, F2, 8, 67) (dual of [(158, 8), 1128, 68]-NRT-code) [i]