MinT - Information on Result #551851

Information on Result #551851

There is no linear OOA(2¹³⁶, 136, F₂, 2, 73) (dual of [(136, 2), 136, 74]-NRT-code), because 9 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2¹²⁷, 136, F₂, 64) (dual of [136, 9, 65]-code), but

residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2⁶³, 71, F₂, 32) (dual of [71, 8, 33]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2³¹, 38, F₂, 16) (dual of [38, 7, 17]-code), but
  - residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2¹⁵, 21, F₂, 8) (dual of [21, 6, 9]-code), but
    - residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2⁷, 12, F₂, 4) (dual of [12, 5, 5]-code), but
      - bound by Fontaine and Peterson [i]

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

	Result		Method
1	No linear OOA(2¹³⁶, 136, F₂, 3, 73) (dual of [(136, 3), 272, 74]-NRT-code)	[i]	Depth Reduction
2	No linear OOA(2¹³⁶, 136, F₂, 4, 73) (dual of [(136, 4), 408, 74]-NRT-code)	[i]
3	No linear OOA(2¹³⁶, 136, F₂, 5, 73) (dual of [(136, 5), 544, 74]-NRT-code)	[i]
4	No linear OOA(2¹³⁶, 136, F₂, 6, 73) (dual of [(136, 6), 680, 74]-NRT-code)	[i]
5	No linear OOA(2¹³⁶, 136, F₂, 7, 73) (dual of [(136, 7), 816, 74]-NRT-code)	[i]
6	No linear OOA(2¹³⁶, 136, F₂, 8, 73) (dual of [(136, 8), 952, 74]-NRT-code)	[i]