Information on Result #551917
There is no linear OOA(2139, 131, F2, 2, 78) (dual of [(131, 2), 123, 79]-NRT-code), because 14 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2125, 131, F2, 64) (dual of [131, 6, 65]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2139, 131, F2, 3, 78) (dual of [(131, 3), 254, 79]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2139, 131, F2, 4, 78) (dual of [(131, 4), 385, 79]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2139, 131, F2, 5, 78) (dual of [(131, 5), 516, 79]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2139, 131, F2, 6, 78) (dual of [(131, 6), 647, 79]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2139, 131, F2, 7, 78) (dual of [(131, 7), 778, 79]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2139, 131, F2, 8, 78) (dual of [(131, 8), 909, 79]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||