Information on Result #551980
There is no linear OOA(2142, 130, F2, 2, 82) (dual of [(130, 2), 118, 83]-NRT-code), because 18 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2124, 130, F2, 64) (dual of [130, 6, 65]-code), but
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2125, 131, F2, 64) (dual of [131, 6, 65]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2142, 130, F2, 3, 82) (dual of [(130, 3), 248, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |