Information on Result #552191
There is no linear OOA(2152, 178, F2, 2, 73) (dual of [(178, 2), 204, 74]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2149, 178, F2, 70) (dual of [178, 29, 71]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2150, 179, F2, 71) (dual of [179, 29, 72]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2152, 178, F2, 3, 73) (dual of [(178, 3), 382, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2152, 178, F2, 4, 73) (dual of [(178, 4), 560, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2152, 178, F2, 5, 73) (dual of [(178, 5), 738, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2152, 178, F2, 6, 73) (dual of [(178, 6), 916, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2152, 178, F2, 7, 73) (dual of [(178, 7), 1094, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2152, 178, F2, 8, 73) (dual of [(178, 8), 1272, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||