Information on Result #552302
There is no linear OOA(2156, 136, F2, 2, 93) (dual of [(136, 2), 116, 94]-NRT-code), because 29 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2127, 136, F2, 64) (dual of [136, 9, 65]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(263, 71, F2, 32) (dual of [71, 8, 33]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(231, 38, F2, 16) (dual of [38, 7, 17]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(215, 21, F2, 8) (dual of [21, 6, 9]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(27, 12, F2, 4) (dual of [12, 5, 5]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(215, 21, F2, 8) (dual of [21, 6, 9]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(231, 38, F2, 16) (dual of [38, 7, 17]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.