Information on Result #552424

There is no linear OOA(2161, 155, F2, 2, 89) (dual of [(155, 2), 149, 90]-NRT-code), because 17 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2144, 155, F2, 72) (dual of [155, 11, 73]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2161, 155, F2, 3, 89) (dual of [(155, 3), 304, 90]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(2161, 155, F2, 4, 89) (dual of [(155, 4), 459, 90]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2161, 155, F2, 5, 89) (dual of [(155, 5), 614, 90]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2161, 155, F2, 6, 89) (dual of [(155, 6), 769, 90]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2161, 155, F2, 7, 89) (dual of [(155, 7), 924, 90]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2161, 155, F2, 8, 89) (dual of [(155, 8), 1079, 90]-NRT-code) [i]