Information on Result #552441
There is no linear OOA(2162, 175, F2, 2, 81) (dual of [(175, 2), 188, 82]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2161, 175, F2, 80) (dual of [175, 14, 81]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(281, 94, F2, 40) (dual of [94, 13, 41]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2162, 175, F2, 3, 81) (dual of [(175, 3), 363, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2162, 175, F2, 4, 81) (dual of [(175, 4), 538, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2162, 175, F2, 5, 81) (dual of [(175, 5), 713, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2162, 175, F2, 6, 81) (dual of [(175, 6), 888, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2162, 175, F2, 7, 81) (dual of [(175, 7), 1063, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2162, 175, F2, 8, 81) (dual of [(175, 8), 1238, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||