Information on Result #552745
There is no linear OOA(2173, 187, F2, 2, 87) (dual of [(187, 2), 201, 88]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2172, 187, F2, 86) (dual of [187, 15, 87]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(286, 100, F2, 43) (dual of [100, 14, 44]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(285, 99, F2, 42) (dual of [99, 14, 43]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2173, 187, F2, 3, 87) (dual of [(187, 3), 388, 88]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2173, 187, F2, 4, 87) (dual of [(187, 4), 575, 88]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2173, 187, F2, 5, 87) (dual of [(187, 5), 762, 88]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2173, 187, F2, 6, 87) (dual of [(187, 6), 949, 88]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2173, 187, F2, 7, 87) (dual of [(187, 7), 1136, 88]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2173, 187, F2, 8, 87) (dual of [(187, 8), 1323, 88]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||