Information on Result #553438
There is no linear OOA(2196, 220, F2, 2, 94) (dual of [(220, 2), 244, 95]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2194, 220, F2, 92) (dual of [220, 26, 93]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2195, 221, F2, 93) (dual of [221, 26, 94]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2196, 220, F2, 3, 94) (dual of [(220, 3), 464, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2196, 220, F2, 4, 94) (dual of [(220, 4), 684, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2196, 220, F2, 5, 94) (dual of [(220, 5), 904, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2196, 220, F2, 6, 94) (dual of [(220, 6), 1124, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2196, 220, F2, 7, 94) (dual of [(220, 7), 1344, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2196, 220, F2, 8, 94) (dual of [(220, 8), 1564, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||