Information on Result #553724

There is no linear OOA(2205, 245, F2, 2, 99) (dual of [(245, 2), 285, 100]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2204, 245, F2, 98) (dual of [245, 41, 99]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2205, 245, F2, 3, 99) (dual of [(245, 3), 530, 100]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(2205, 245, F2, 4, 99) (dual of [(245, 4), 775, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2205, 245, F2, 5, 99) (dual of [(245, 5), 1020, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2205, 245, F2, 6, 99) (dual of [(245, 6), 1265, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2205, 245, F2, 7, 99) (dual of [(245, 7), 1510, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2205, 245, F2, 8, 99) (dual of [(245, 8), 1755, 100]-NRT-code) [i]