Information on Result #554094
There is no linear OOA(2218, 202, F2, 2, 122) (dual of [(202, 2), 186, 123]-NRT-code), because 26 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2192, 202, F2, 96) (dual of [202, 10, 97]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(296, 105, F2, 48) (dual of [105, 9, 49]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(248, 56, F2, 24) (dual of [56, 8, 25]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(249, 57, F2, 25) (dual of [57, 8, 26]-code), but
- “BJV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(249, 57, F2, 25) (dual of [57, 8, 26]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(248, 56, F2, 24) (dual of [56, 8, 25]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2218, 202, F2, 3, 122) (dual of [(202, 3), 388, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2218, 202, F2, 4, 122) (dual of [(202, 4), 590, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||