Information on Result #554540
There is no linear OOA(2236, 217, F2, 2, 133) (dual of [(217, 2), 198, 134]-NRT-code), because 29 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2207, 217, F2, 104) (dual of [217, 10, 105]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2103, 112, F2, 52) (dual of [112, 9, 53]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(251, 59, F2, 26) (dual of [59, 8, 27]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(252, 60, F2, 27) (dual of [60, 8, 28]-code), but
- “BJV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(252, 60, F2, 27) (dual of [60, 8, 28]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(251, 59, F2, 26) (dual of [59, 8, 27]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2236, 217, F2, 3, 133) (dual of [(217, 3), 415, 134]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2236, 217, F2, 4, 133) (dual of [(217, 4), 632, 134]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||