Information on Result #554913

There is no linear OOA(2250, 259, F2, 2, 127) (dual of [(259, 2), 268, 128]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2247, 259, F2, 124) (dual of [259, 12, 125]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2250, 259, F2, 3, 127) (dual of [(259, 3), 527, 128]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(2250, 259, F2, 4, 127) (dual of [(259, 4), 786, 128]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2250, 259, F2, 5, 127) (dual of [(259, 5), 1045, 128]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2250, 259, F2, 6, 127) (dual of [(259, 6), 1304, 128]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2250, 259, F2, 7, 127) (dual of [(259, 7), 1563, 128]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2250, 259, F2, 8, 127) (dual of [(259, 8), 1822, 128]-NRT-code) [i]