Information on Result #554918
There is no linear OOA(2250, 242, F2, 2, 135) (dual of [(242, 2), 234, 136]-NRT-code), because 15 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2235, 242, F2, 120) (dual of [242, 7, 121]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2250, 242, F2, 3, 135) (dual of [(242, 3), 476, 136]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2250, 242, F2, 4, 135) (dual of [(242, 4), 718, 136]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2250, 242, F2, 5, 135) (dual of [(242, 5), 960, 136]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2250, 242, F2, 6, 135) (dual of [(242, 6), 1202, 136]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2250, 242, F2, 7, 135) (dual of [(242, 7), 1444, 136]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2250, 242, F2, 8, 135) (dual of [(242, 8), 1686, 136]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||