MinT - Information on Result #555110

Information on Result #555110

There is no linear OOA(2²⁵⁶, 265, F₂, 2, 129) (dual of [(265, 2), 274, 130]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2²⁵⁵, 265, F₂, 128) (dual of [265, 10, 129]-code), but

residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2¹²⁷, 136, F₂, 64) (dual of [136, 9, 65]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2⁶³, 71, F₂, 32) (dual of [71, 8, 33]-code), but
  - residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2³¹, 38, F₂, 16) (dual of [38, 7, 17]-code), but
    - residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2¹⁵, 21, F₂, 8) (dual of [21, 6, 9]-code), but
      - residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2⁷, 12, F₂, 4) (dual of [12, 5, 5]-code), but
        bound by Fontaine and Peterson [i]

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

	Result		Method
1	No linear OOA(2²⁵⁶, 265, F₂, 3, 129) (dual of [(265, 3), 539, 130]-NRT-code)	[i]	Depth Reduction
2	No linear OOA(2²⁵⁶, 265, F₂, 4, 129) (dual of [(265, 4), 804, 130]-NRT-code)	[i]
3	No linear OOA(2²⁵⁶, 265, F₂, 5, 129) (dual of [(265, 5), 1069, 130]-NRT-code)	[i]
4	No linear OOA(2²⁵⁶, 265, F₂, 6, 129) (dual of [(265, 6), 1334, 130]-NRT-code)	[i]
5	No linear OOA(2²⁵⁶, 265, F₂, 7, 129) (dual of [(265, 7), 1599, 130]-NRT-code)	[i]
6	No linear OOA(2²⁵⁶, 265, F₂, 8, 129) (dual of [(265, 8), 1864, 130]-NRT-code)	[i]