Information on Result #555258
There is no linear OOA(2260, 259, F2, 2, 136) (dual of [(259, 2), 258, 137]-NRT-code), because 8 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2252, 259, F2, 128) (dual of [259, 7, 129]-code), but
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2253, 260, F2, 128) (dual of [260, 7, 129]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2260, 259, F2, 3, 136) (dual of [(259, 3), 517, 137]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2260, 259, F2, 4, 136) (dual of [(259, 4), 776, 137]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2260, 259, F2, 5, 136) (dual of [(259, 5), 1035, 137]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2260, 259, F2, 6, 136) (dual of [(259, 6), 1294, 137]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2260, 259, F2, 7, 136) (dual of [(259, 7), 1553, 137]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2260, 259, F2, 8, 136) (dual of [(259, 8), 1812, 137]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||