Information on Result #555415
There is no linear OOA(353, 40, F3, 2, 42) (dual of [(40, 2), 27, 43]-NRT-code), because 18 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(335, 40, F3, 24) (dual of [40, 5, 25]-code), but
- “vE1†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(353, 40, F3, 3, 42) (dual of [(40, 3), 67, 43]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(353, 40, F3, 4, 42) (dual of [(40, 4), 107, 43]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(353, 40, F3, 5, 42) (dual of [(40, 5), 147, 43]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||