Information on Result #555435
There is no linear OOA(356, 58, F3, 2, 39) (dual of [(58, 2), 60, 40]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(353, 58, F3, 36) (dual of [58, 5, 37]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(317, 21, F3, 12) (dual of [21, 4, 13]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(356, 58, F3, 3, 39) (dual of [(58, 3), 118, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(356, 58, F3, 4, 39) (dual of [(58, 4), 176, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(356, 58, F3, 5, 39) (dual of [(58, 5), 234, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||