Information on Result #555484
There is no linear OOA(361, 43, F3, 2, 49) (dual of [(43, 2), 25, 50]-NRT-code), because 22 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(339, 43, F3, 27) (dual of [43, 4, 28]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(361, 43, F3, 3, 49) (dual of [(43, 3), 68, 50]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(361, 43, F3, 4, 49) (dual of [(43, 4), 111, 50]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(361, 43, F3, 5, 49) (dual of [(43, 5), 154, 50]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||