Information on Result #555552
There is no linear OOA(369, 58, F3, 2, 52) (dual of [(58, 2), 47, 53]-NRT-code), because 16 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(353, 58, F3, 36) (dual of [58, 5, 37]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(317, 21, F3, 12) (dual of [21, 4, 13]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(369, 58, F3, 3, 52) (dual of [(58, 3), 105, 53]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(369, 58, F3, 4, 52) (dual of [(58, 4), 163, 53]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(369, 58, F3, 5, 52) (dual of [(58, 5), 221, 53]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||