Information on Result #555748
There is no linear OOA(387, 71, F3, 2, 66) (dual of [(71, 2), 55, 67]-NRT-code), because 21 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(366, 71, F3, 45) (dual of [71, 5, 46]-code), but
- “HW1†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(387, 71, F3, 3, 66) (dual of [(71, 3), 126, 67]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(387, 71, F3, 4, 66) (dual of [(71, 4), 197, 67]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(387, 71, F3, 5, 66) (dual of [(71, 5), 268, 67]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||