Information on Result #555756
There is no linear OOA(388, 81, F3, 2, 64) (dual of [(81, 2), 74, 65]-NRT-code), because 13 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(375, 81, F3, 51) (dual of [81, 6, 52]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(388, 81, F3, 3, 64) (dual of [(81, 3), 155, 65]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(388, 81, F3, 4, 64) (dual of [(81, 4), 236, 65]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(388, 81, F3, 5, 64) (dual of [(81, 5), 317, 65]-NRT-code) | [i] |