Information on Result #555764
There is no linear OOA(389, 93, F3, 2, 61) (dual of [(93, 2), 97, 62]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(388, 93, F3, 60) (dual of [93, 5, 61]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(389, 93, F3, 3, 61) (dual of [(93, 3), 190, 62]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(389, 93, F3, 4, 61) (dual of [(93, 4), 283, 62]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(389, 93, F3, 5, 61) (dual of [(93, 5), 376, 62]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||