Information on Result #555843
There is no linear OOA(395, 81, F3, 2, 71) (dual of [(81, 2), 67, 72]-NRT-code), because 20 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(375, 81, F3, 51) (dual of [81, 6, 52]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(395, 81, F3, 3, 71) (dual of [(81, 3), 148, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(395, 81, F3, 4, 71) (dual of [(81, 4), 229, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(395, 81, F3, 5, 71) (dual of [(81, 5), 310, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||