Information on Result #556645
There is no linear OOA(3156, 185, F3, 2, 103) (dual of [(185, 2), 214, 104]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3155, 185, F3, 102) (dual of [185, 30, 103]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(353, 82, S3, 34), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 109 763126 725714 200014 609915 641908 532996 574841 / 4 714638 489586 850000 > 353 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3156, 185, F3, 3, 103) (dual of [(185, 3), 399, 104]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3156, 185, F3, 4, 103) (dual of [(185, 4), 584, 104]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3156, 185, F3, 5, 103) (dual of [(185, 5), 769, 104]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||