Information on Result #557697
There is no linear OOA(3211, 225, F3, 2, 140) (dual of [(225, 2), 239, 141]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3209, 225, F3, 138) (dual of [225, 16, 139]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(371, 86, F3, 46) (dual of [86, 15, 47]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3211, 225, F3, 3, 140) (dual of [(225, 3), 464, 141]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3211, 225, F3, 4, 140) (dual of [(225, 4), 689, 141]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3211, 225, F3, 5, 140) (dual of [(225, 5), 914, 141]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||