Information on Result #557990
There is no linear OOA(3221, 245, F3, 2, 146) (dual of [(245, 2), 269, 147]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3219, 245, F3, 144) (dual of [245, 26, 145]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(375, 100, S3, 48), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 226 805771 897859 565583 876956 237485 928730 202904 705179 / 269 019371 489414 > 375 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(3221, 245, F3, 3, 146) (dual of [(245, 3), 514, 147]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(3221, 245, F3, 4, 146) (dual of [(245, 4), 759, 147]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(3221, 245, F3, 5, 146) (dual of [(245, 5), 1004, 147]-NRT-code) | [i] |