Information on Result #558215
There is no linear OOA(3228, 369, F3, 2, 145) (dual of [(369, 2), 510, 146]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3227, 369, F3, 144) (dual of [369, 142, 145]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(383, 224, F3, 48) (dual of [224, 141, 49]-code), but
- the Johnson bound shows that N ≤ 18 650275 231410 181575 562142 123676 906294 083572 717553 183697 141026 684466 < 3141 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3228, 369, F3, 3, 145) (dual of [(369, 3), 879, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3228, 369, F3, 4, 145) (dual of [(369, 4), 1248, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3228, 369, F3, 5, 145) (dual of [(369, 5), 1617, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||