Information on Result #558463
There is no linear OOA(3235, 353, F3, 2, 152) (dual of [(353, 2), 471, 153]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3233, 353, F3, 150) (dual of [353, 120, 151]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(383, 202, F3, 50) (dual of [202, 119, 51]-code), but
- the Johnson bound shows that N ≤ 550 972990 432084 950775 442566 323188 109097 170341 593919 868682 < 3119 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3235, 353, F3, 3, 152) (dual of [(353, 3), 824, 153]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3235, 353, F3, 4, 152) (dual of [(353, 4), 1177, 153]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3235, 353, F3, 5, 152) (dual of [(353, 5), 1530, 153]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||