Information on Result #558685
There is no linear OOA(3241, 252, F3, 2, 161) (dual of [(252, 2), 263, 162]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3239, 252, F3, 159) (dual of [252, 13, 160]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(380, 92, S3, 53), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2 550145 733885 710214 972383 625690 731033 510053 / 13237 > 380 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3241, 252, F3, 3, 161) (dual of [(252, 3), 515, 162]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3241, 252, F3, 4, 161) (dual of [(252, 4), 767, 162]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3241, 252, F3, 5, 161) (dual of [(252, 5), 1019, 162]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||