Information on Result #558881
There is no linear OOA(3246, 235, F3, 2, 171) (dual of [(235, 2), 224, 172]-NRT-code), because 18 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3228, 235, F3, 153) (dual of [235, 7, 154]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(375, 81, F3, 51) (dual of [81, 6, 52]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3246, 235, F3, 3, 171) (dual of [(235, 3), 459, 172]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3246, 235, F3, 4, 171) (dual of [(235, 4), 694, 172]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3246, 235, F3, 5, 171) (dual of [(235, 5), 929, 172]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||