Information on Result #558950
There is no linear OOA(3248, 269, F3, 2, 164) (dual of [(269, 2), 290, 165]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3246, 269, F3, 162) (dual of [269, 23, 163]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(384, 106, S3, 54), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 554636 234644 780595 906506 938993 021399 906097 624808 134107 / 34 652730 233275 > 384 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3248, 269, F3, 3, 164) (dual of [(269, 3), 559, 165]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3248, 269, F3, 4, 164) (dual of [(269, 4), 828, 165]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3248, 269, F3, 5, 164) (dual of [(269, 5), 1097, 165]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||