Information on Result #559034
There is no linear OOA(3250, 245, F3, 2, 172) (dual of [(245, 2), 240, 173]-NRT-code), because 10 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(3240, 245, F3, 162) (dual of [245, 5, 163]-code), but
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(3241, 246, F3, 162) (dual of [246, 5, 163]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(3250, 245, F3, 3, 172) (dual of [(245, 3), 485, 173]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(3250, 245, F3, 4, 172) (dual of [(245, 4), 730, 173]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3250, 245, F3, 5, 172) (dual of [(245, 5), 975, 173]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||