Information on Result #559640
There is no linear OOA(4107, 96, F4, 2, 85) (dual of [(96, 2), 85, 86]-NRT-code), because 21 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(486, 96, F4, 64) (dual of [96, 10, 65]-code), but
- “Gur†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(4107, 96, F4, 3, 85) (dual of [(96, 3), 181, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |