Information on Result #561822
There is no linear OOA(4250, 170, F4, 2, 210) (dual of [(170, 2), 90, 211]-NRT-code), because 86 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(4164, 170, F4, 124) (dual of [170, 6, 125]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(440, 45, F4, 31) (dual of [45, 5, 32]-code), but
- “Liz†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(4250, 170, F4, 3, 210) (dual of [(170, 3), 260, 211]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |