Information on Result #562010
There is no linear OOA(4256, 296, F4, 2, 190) (dual of [(296, 2), 336, 191]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(4254, 296, F4, 188) (dual of [296, 42, 189]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(466, 107, S4, 47), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 877667 617526 699604 115459 206661 960900 469804 406919 637481 696619 379668 118193 820628 156416 / 152 206215 688292 487856 759376 046017 491747 653675 > 466 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(4256, 296, F4, 3, 190) (dual of [(296, 3), 632, 191]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |