Information on Result #563127
There is no linear OOA(824, 15, F8, 2, 23) (dual of [(15, 2), 6, 24]-NRT-code), because 15 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(89, 15, F8, 8) (dual of [15, 6, 9]-code), but
- “MPa†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(825, 16, F8, 2, 24) (dual of [(16, 2), 7, 25]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(826, 16, F8, 2, 25) (dual of [(16, 2), 6, 26]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(824, 15, F8, 3, 23) (dual of [(15, 3), 21, 24]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |