Information on Result #563246
There is no linear OOA(865, 34, F8, 2, 62) (dual of [(34, 2), 3, 63]-NRT-code), because 34 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(831, 34, F8, 28) (dual of [34, 3, 29]-code), but
- “Mas†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(866, 35, F8, 2, 63) (dual of [(35, 2), 4, 64]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(867, 35, F8, 2, 64) (dual of [(35, 2), 3, 65]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(868, 36, F8, 2, 65) (dual of [(36, 2), 4, 66]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(865, 34, F8, 3, 62) (dual of [(34, 3), 37, 63]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |