Information on Result #563351
There is no linear OOA(897, 50, F8, 2, 92) (dual of [(50, 2), 3, 93]-NRT-code), because 50 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(847, 50, F8, 42) (dual of [50, 3, 43]-code), but
- “Hi4†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(898, 51, F8, 2, 93) (dual of [(51, 2), 4, 94]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(899, 51, F8, 2, 94) (dual of [(51, 2), 3, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(897, 50, F8, 3, 92) (dual of [(50, 3), 53, 93]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |