Information on Result #563356
There is no linear OOA(899, 80, F8, 2, 90) (dual of [(80, 2), 61, 91]-NRT-code), because 26 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(873, 80, F8, 64) (dual of [80, 7, 65]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(89, 15, F8, 8) (dual of [15, 6, 9]-code), but
- “MPa†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(899, 80, F8, 3, 90) (dual of [(80, 3), 141, 91]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |