Information on Result #563467
There is no linear OOA(8153, 80, F8, 2, 144) (dual of [(80, 2), 7, 145]-NRT-code), because 80 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(873, 80, F8, 64) (dual of [80, 7, 65]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(89, 15, F8, 8) (dual of [15, 6, 9]-code), but
- “MPa†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(8154, 81, F8, 2, 145) (dual of [(81, 2), 8, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(8155, 81, F8, 2, 146) (dual of [(81, 2), 7, 147]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(8157, 82, F8, 2, 148) (dual of [(82, 2), 7, 149]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(8153, 80, F8, 3, 144) (dual of [(80, 3), 87, 145]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |